No direct comparison has been performed between different programmed cell death-1(PD-1)inhibitors for first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).The feasibility of using PD-L1-exp...No direct comparison has been performed between different programmed cell death-1(PD-1)inhibitors for first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).The feasibility of using PD-L1-expression-guided immunotherapy remains unknown.In this open-label,phase 2 study(NCT04252365),patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations were randomized(1:1)to receive sintilimab or pembrolizumab monotherapy(PD-L1 expression≥50%),or sintilimab or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy(PD-L1 expression<50%).The sample size was calculated by optimal two-stage design.The primary endpoint was the objective response rate(ORR).The study included 71 patients(sintilimab arms,n=35;pembrolizumab arms,n=36)and met its primary endpoint,with a confirmed ORR of 51.4%(18/35)in the sintilimab arms.The confirmed ORR(95%confidence interval)was 46.2%(19.2%,74.9%)and 42.9%(17.7%,71.1%)for patients treated with sintilimab and pembrolizumab monotherapy;and 54.5%(32.2%,75.6%)and 45.4%(24.4%,67.8%)for those treated with sintilimab-and pembrolizumab-based combination therapies.The median progression-free survival was6.9 versus 8.1 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients,respectively,in which it was 7.6 versus 11.0 months in monotherapy and 7.4 versus 7.1 months in combination therapies.The median overall survival was 14.9 versus 21.3 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients,respectively,in which it was 14.9 versus 22.6 months in monotherapy and 14.7 versus 17.3 months in combination therapies.Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with safety outcomes of monotherapy and combination therapy in previous phase III studies.However,the incidence of rash was higher with sintilimab than pembrolizumab monotherapy.This is the first prospective phase 2 study to directly compare two anti-PD-1 antibodies as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC.Sintilimab was efficacious and well-tolerated irrespective of PD-L1 expression level in 展开更多
1 文献来源
Reynolds C, Obasaju C, Schell M J, et al. Randomized phase IU trial of Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with in situ RRM1 and ERCC1 protein levels for response prediction in non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J...1 文献来源
Reynolds C, Obasaju C, Schell M J, et al. Randomized phase IU trial of Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with in situ RRM1 and ERCC1 protein levels for response prediction in non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009,27（34）：5808-5815.展开更多
基金supported by the Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer(2017B030314120)the Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital Scientific Research Funds for Leading Medical Talents in Guangdong Province(KJ012019426)+2 种基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82072562 and 82202997)the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2021M701422)the High-Level Hospital Construction Project(DFJH201810).
文摘No direct comparison has been performed between different programmed cell death-1(PD-1)inhibitors for first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).The feasibility of using PD-L1-expression-guided immunotherapy remains unknown.In this open-label,phase 2 study(NCT04252365),patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations were randomized(1:1)to receive sintilimab or pembrolizumab monotherapy(PD-L1 expression≥50%),or sintilimab or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy(PD-L1 expression<50%).The sample size was calculated by optimal two-stage design.The primary endpoint was the objective response rate(ORR).The study included 71 patients(sintilimab arms,n=35;pembrolizumab arms,n=36)and met its primary endpoint,with a confirmed ORR of 51.4%(18/35)in the sintilimab arms.The confirmed ORR(95%confidence interval)was 46.2%(19.2%,74.9%)and 42.9%(17.7%,71.1%)for patients treated with sintilimab and pembrolizumab monotherapy;and 54.5%(32.2%,75.6%)and 45.4%(24.4%,67.8%)for those treated with sintilimab-and pembrolizumab-based combination therapies.The median progression-free survival was6.9 versus 8.1 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients,respectively,in which it was 7.6 versus 11.0 months in monotherapy and 7.4 versus 7.1 months in combination therapies.The median overall survival was 14.9 versus 21.3 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients,respectively,in which it was 14.9 versus 22.6 months in monotherapy and 14.7 versus 17.3 months in combination therapies.Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with safety outcomes of monotherapy and combination therapy in previous phase III studies.However,the incidence of rash was higher with sintilimab than pembrolizumab monotherapy.This is the first prospective phase 2 study to directly compare two anti-PD-1 antibodies as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC.Sintilimab was efficacious and well-tolerated irrespective of PD-L1 expression level in
文摘1 文献来源
Reynolds C, Obasaju C, Schell M J, et al. Randomized phase IU trial of Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with in situ RRM1 and ERCC1 protein levels for response prediction in non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009,27（34）：5808-5815.
