With the transforming from the perspective of modernization to that of modernity, Max Stirner and nihilist question are increasingly manifesting their character and importance. Marx really criticizes the tactics of St...With the transforming from the perspective of modernization to that of modernity, Max Stirner and nihilist question are increasingly manifesting their character and importance. Marx really criticizes the tactics of Stirner who rejects metaphysical theory with secularity taking place of divinity, personal-self taking place of subject. First, “Einzige” that is the embodiment of the petty bourgeois necessarily eliminates the groundwork of modern ideas, such as equality, and brings about the social Darwinism of the law of the jungle. Second, in order to prevent from falling into nihilism, “the real man” who surely maintains a certain sacred dimension, keeping the dialectical frame of divinity and secularity, personality and universality, differs from Einzige that gives up this frame and dimension. Einzige is not the conception of knowledge theory, not the abstract of metaphysics, but ought to be of the value of practice philosophy. The event of Stirner indicates that it should be marked limits to promote sensitive, reality and to criticize metaphysics. At least, in the meaning of practice philosophy, Marx still insists a certain value metaphysics, for he criticizes just the traditional way and form of thinking of constructing value metaphysics.展开更多
文摘With the transforming from the perspective of modernization to that of modernity, Max Stirner and nihilist question are increasingly manifesting their character and importance. Marx really criticizes the tactics of Stirner who rejects metaphysical theory with secularity taking place of divinity, personal-self taking place of subject. First, “Einzige” that is the embodiment of the petty bourgeois necessarily eliminates the groundwork of modern ideas, such as equality, and brings about the social Darwinism of the law of the jungle. Second, in order to prevent from falling into nihilism, “the real man” who surely maintains a certain sacred dimension, keeping the dialectical frame of divinity and secularity, personality and universality, differs from Einzige that gives up this frame and dimension. Einzige is not the conception of knowledge theory, not the abstract of metaphysics, but ought to be of the value of practice philosophy. The event of Stirner indicates that it should be marked limits to promote sensitive, reality and to criticize metaphysics. At least, in the meaning of practice philosophy, Marx still insists a certain value metaphysics, for he criticizes just the traditional way and form of thinking of constructing value metaphysics.
