期刊文献+

《美墨加协定》金融服务规则的新发展——以GATS与CPTPP为比较视角 被引量:10

Evolution of USMCA Financial Services Rules: Comparative Perspectives from GATS and CPTPP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定》(USMCA)是美式FTAs金融服务规则的最新范本。该协定基于'贸易和投资'双重视角而扩张的适用范围,负面清单为主的制表模式,以及确保审慎监管空间的法定例外,构成对以GATS及其《金融服务附件》为基础的多边金融服务贸易体制的超越。相较于美国此前主导制定的TPP文本,USMCA在金融服务规则上呈现出新的发展趋势,集中表现于禁止本地化要求与金融服务争端解决机制两个领域。研判USMCA金融服务规则的演进趋势及其背后机理,有助于中国检视自身经贸协定项下的规则实践,并为中国金融服务规则的升级和优化提供有益参考。 The US-Mexico-Canada Agreement(USMCA)is the latest model to explore United States’approach in financial services rules.Going beyond the existing multilateral regime based on GATS and its Financial Services Annex,the USMCA expands its scope of coverage by combining trade rules with investment rules,optimize exception clauses to secure policy space for prudential regulation,and deepens its liberalization through negative-list scheduling.Compared with the original CPTPP texts which the United States once presided over,two emerging trends can be identified in the newly-formulated USMCA:the prohibition on forced localization,and the increasing dominant role of states in handling financial service disputes.By exploring the evolutionary financial services rules of the USMCA and the underlying rationale,this Article aims at providing constructive suggestions on how to upgrade and improve financial services rules in China’s trade agreements.
作者 杨幸幸 YANG Xingxing
出处 《经贸法律评论》 2019年第4期45-58,共14页 Business and Economic Law Review
基金 教育部人文社科青年基金项目“经济数字化背景下跨境数据流动的国际规制研究”(项目批准号:19YJC820066)
关键词 USMCA 金融服务 禁止本地化要求 金融争议解决 USMCA Trade in Financial Services Prohibition on Forced Localization Financial Disputes Settlement
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1Nancy J. King, Kishani Kalupahana, Choosing between Liberalization and Regulatory Autonomy under GATS: Implications of U. S. Gambling for Trade in Cross-border E-services, Vanderbih Journal of Transna- tional Law, November 2007, p. 212. 被引量:1
  • 2Panel Report,U. S. Gambling Case,paras. 6. 134 and 6. 285-6. 287. 被引量:1
  • 3Appellate Body Report,U. S. --Gam- bling Case,paras 213 and 256. 被引量:1
  • 4Panel Report, U. S.--Gambling Case, para. 6. 285. 被引量:1
  • 5Wunsch-Vincent, The Internet, Cross-border Trade in Services, and the GATS: Lessons from US-Gambling, World Trade Review, 2006, p. 319. 被引量:1
  • 6Kern Alexander and Mads Andenas,The World Trade Organization and Trade in Services, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, p. 391. 被引量:1
  • 7Committee on Trade in Financial Services, Report of Informal Consultations held on 27 June 1997 on the Distinction between Modes 1 and 2 in Financial Services, Informal Note by the Secretariat, 1997, p. 11. 被引量:1
  • 8World Trade Organization, Annual Report of the Committee on Trade in Financial Services to the Council for Trade in Services, S/FIN/14,20 September 2005, p. 1. 被引量:1
  • 9WTO Secretariat Trade in Service Division, An Introduction to the GATS, October 1999, pp. 10-11. 被引量:1

共引文献7

引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部