摘要
在艺术史学的身份确认过程中,应遵从艺术史的“共性”特征,并匡正、厘清其交错接纳与边界扩展问题的认识。对此问题认识的前提条件,是以遵循艺术共性规律的艺术史探究为宗旨。关于艺术史的概念阐释、界域范畴厘清,以及针对艺术史学理论与方法论的探讨,可谓是促进艺术史研究突破门类艺术史认知界域钳制的关键。并且,依据史学研究特有的哲学思考方式,形成对艺术史“整体性”逻辑的判断,使之连贯成艺术史学“一致性”和“系统性”的认识思想,进而确立出艺术史“公共阐释”与“公共史学”的价值,考察其存在与发展的正当性与合理性,求证艺术史的交错与边界扩展所具有的治史多元路径,更有利于确立艺术史及艺术史学研究的主体框架,构建起新的艺术史及艺术史学的观念。
During the identification of the history of art,the"commonality"of art history should be followed so as to sort out the understanding of the issues of the interactive acceptance and the extension of border.The precondition of the understanding of these issues lies in the investigation of the common principles of art history.Studies about the concepts,borders,and the theories and methodologies of art history can be seen as a key approach to art history to breakthrough the genre of art history.Furthermore,it is necessary to follow the characteristic philosophical thinking of history to form the logic judgement of the"integrity"of art history in order to construct the understanding of"consistence"and"system"of art history,with the aim to establish the values of"public interpretation"and"public history"of art history.An investigation of the legitimacy and validity of the existence and development of art history,as well as the multiple approaches to the study of history within the interaction and the extension of the border of art history,is conducive to the establishment of the subjective approach of art history and the study of the history of art,so as to construct new concept of art history and the history of art.
作者
夏燕靖
Xia Yanjing(Nanjing University of Arts,Nanjing,Jiangsu,210013)
出处
《民族艺术研究》
CSSCI
2021年第4期5-16,共12页
Ethnic Art Studies
基金
2020年度国家社会科学基金艺术学重大项目“跨门类艺术史学理论与方法研究”(项目批准号:20ZD25)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
艺术史
艺术史学
“共性”特征
交错接纳
边界扩展
art history
the history of art
characteristics of"commonality"
interactive acceptance
extension of border
