期刊文献+

集置、致命策略与历史唯物主义——现代技术批判的三重向度 被引量:6

Ge-stell,Fatal Strategy and Historical Materialism--Triple Dimensions of Criticism of Modern Technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代化浪潮将人类卷入一个技术化的世界,“技术至上”成为现代社会的基本信念之一。对“现代技术”批判呈现出三种不同的向度。海德格尔认为现代技术的本质是“集置”,它是一种解蔽方式,人们想要破解技术的统治需要重温古希腊技艺时代,让现代社会在“诗意”中获得拯救。在鲍德里亚那里,技术用一种激进的“致命策略”将人类抛入被技术完全控制的未来中。其反抗方法是将原始交换社会作为最佳范本,用象征交换逻辑代替技术逻辑。马克思更加关注技术的资本主义应用与其社会结构之间的内在必然关系,技术批判由此成为一种社会批判,旨在挖掘资本主义的内在崩溃逻辑,从而完成从解释世界到改变世界的辩证法叙事。不同于海氏与鲍氏的“复古”倾向,马克思的批判更具现代激进气质。因此,现代技术批判又保持着双重批判的内在张力。 The wave of modernization has involved human beings in a technological world.The revolution of contemporary technology has rapidly rewritten the historical picture of society,greatly impacted and updated people's life logic,and made technology supremacy the basic belief of the current era.The critique of this modern technology issue presents three different dimensions.In Heidegger's inquiry,the essence of modern technology is Ge-stell,which is a way of uncovering.If people want to break the rule of technology,they need to review the ancient Greek art age,so that modern society can be saved in poetic.Baudrillard believes that technology has a radical form,which takes a fatal strategy on human subjects,that is,human beings are thrown into the fatal future completely controlled by technology.His method of resistance is to take the non-utilitarian primitive exchange society as the best model and replace the technical logic with symbolic exchange logic.Marx paid more attention to the inherent inevitable relationship between the capitalist application of technology and its social structure.Based on this,the technical criticism of historical materialism is also a kind of social criticism.Its ultimate purpose is to excavate the internal collapse logic of capitalism,so as to complete the dialectical narration from explaining the world to changing the world.In Heidegger's and Baudrillard's technical criticism,there is a tendency of returning to the ancients,while Marx's criticism is more modern and radical.Therefore,modern technological criticism maintains the inner tension of double criticism.
作者 代砚春 薛天天 DAI Yan-chun;XUE Tian-tian(School of Marxism,Hebei University of Economics and Business,Shijiazhuang Hebei 050061,China;Hebei University of Economic and Businese,Shijiazhuang Hebei 050061,China)
出处 《内蒙古社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期60-66,共7页 Inner Mongolia Social Sciences
基金 河北省社会科学基金青年项目“马克思现代性批判思想的当代解释”(编号:HB18ZX008)。
关键词 技术批判 集置 致命策略 历史唯物主义 Technical Criticism Ge-stell Fatal Strategy Historical Materialism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1张盾著..超越审美现代性 从文艺美学到政治美学[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2017:256.
  • 2代砚春.作为现代叙事的“艺术存在论”[J].内蒙古社会科学,2016,37(5):59-64. 被引量:1
  • 3张盾.马克思与政治美学[J].中国社会科学,2017(2):4-24. 被引量:34
  • 4马克斯·韦伯著,冯克利译..学术与政治:韦伯的两篇演说[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2013:204.
  • 5孔明安著..物·象征·仿真 鲍德里亚哲学思想研究[M].芜湖:安徽师范大学出版社,2010:239.

二级参考文献17

  • 1海德格尔.形而上学导论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.45. 被引量:166
  • 2阿多诺.美学理论[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1998.. 被引量:90
  • 3阿多诺.否定的辩证法[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1993.98-99. 被引量:58
  • 4威廉·巴雷特.非理性的人[M].杨照明等译.北京:商务印书馆,1995. 被引量:17
  • 5马丁·海德格尔.林中路[M].孙周兴,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2004. 被引量:20
  • 6哈贝马斯.现代性的哲学话语[M].曹卫东译.南京:译林出版社,2011. 被引量:13
  • 7黑格尔.小逻辑[M].贺麟,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007. 被引量:5
  • 8海德格尔.存在与时间[M].陈嘉映,王庆节译.熊伟校,陈嘉映,修订,北京:三联书店.2012. 被引量:6
  • 9宋祖良.拯救地球和人类的未来[M].北京:商务印书馆,1994. 被引量:2
  • 10张盾.道法自然--存在论的构成原理[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000. 被引量:1

共引文献33

同被引文献70

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部