摘要
布朗肖在《无尽的谈话》中分析了维特根斯坦的难题,在维特根斯坦试图用沉默遮蔽的私人空间和私人表达背后看到语言作为他者存在的可能性。布朗肖用语言游戏将维特根斯坦的难题变成了他文学创作的核心,他让语言经历分裂的考验,用沉默和消失后的空无来完成一部作品。布朗肖背离了维特根斯坦的语言共同体,在语言的间隙之处用沉默成就作品的深度,它既不指代也不揭示,而是作为一种陌异的语言他者向我们走来。本文试图通过分析布朗肖文学创作中的语言游戏来厘清他思考维特根斯坦语言问题的路径,同时,维特根斯坦的语言观也能够提供一个反向视角,让我们看到布朗肖是如何用这种语言游戏来确立自己的语言创作风格的。
Maurice Blanchot analyzed Ludwig Wittgenstein’s problems in his Infinite Conversation. In the private space and expression that Wittgenstein tried to conceal with his silence, Blanchot saw the possibility of language as the Other. Through the language games, he turned Wittgenstein’s problem into the core of his literary works, letting the language experience the test of splitting, and completing the work with silence and void. Deviated from Wittgenstein’s language community, Blanchot cultivated the depth of the work with silence that exists in the distance of the language, which neither signifies nor reveals, but comes to us as the other in a strange language. This paper attempts to clarify Blanchot’s path of dealing with Wittgenstein’s language problems by analyzing the language games in his literary writing. Meanwhile, Wittgenstein’s view of language, in turn, can also show how Blanchot established his own language style through language games.
作者
柳文文
Liu Wenwen(School of Foreign Languages,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan,Hubei Province,China)
出处
《外国文学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期119-128,共10页
Foreign Literature
基金
武汉理工大学自主创新研究基金(2018VI023)。
