期刊文献+

2016年NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南(第1版)更新与解读 被引量:36

Updates and interpretations of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for breast cancer(Version 1, 2016)
原文传递
导出
摘要 2016年美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)乳腺癌临床实践指南(第1版)更新涉及诊断与评估,外科手术,新辅助化疗,辅助化、放疗,靶向治疗,内分泌治疗,晚期解救治疗及随访等方面。回顾NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南引进中国的10年历程,从依据肿瘤TNM分期实施群体治疗,到推荐参考肿瘤病理学免疫组化结果实施分类治疗,标志我国乳腺癌临床诊治逐渐进入规范化、专业化阶段。第二代测序技术联合其他非解剖学信息,建立个体化预后评价系统,是美国癌症联合会(AJCC)和国际抗癌联盟(UICC)联合制定的第8版TNM分期系统的更新亮点。其中,推荐针对包括乳腺癌在内7类肿瘤作为研究方向,对乳腺癌本质的深入认识将推动乳腺癌进入个体化诊治新阶段。 Updates of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for breast cancer involved workup, surgical treatment, preoperative systemic therapy, systemic adjuvant treatment, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, endocrine therapy, treatment of recurrence/stage IV disease and follow-up. Since the NCCN Guidelines were introduced into China ten years ago, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have achieved prominent progress from group-based therapy based on TNM stage to classification treatment based on pathology and immanohistoehemistry, symbolizing specialization and standardization of the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in China. The next-generation sequencing technology and other non-anatomical information will be used to build an individual prognostic system, which is the highlight of the 8th edition TNM cancer staging system. Seven kinds of tumor including breast cancer have been selected. A deeper understanding of the nature of breast cancer will build a bridge to the Personalized Medicine.
出处 《中国实用外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期1066-1072,共7页 Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
基金 首都医学发展科研基金资助项目(No.2009-1011) 首都临床特色应用研究资助项目(No.Z131107002213007)
关键词 乳腺癌 NCCN指南 breast cancer NCCN guideline
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Network National Comprehensive Cancer. NCCN Clinical Prac- tice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. V.1.2016 [S/OL]. [ 2016-09-13 ].http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/ pdf/breast.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 2江泽飞.乳腺癌治疗决策:从个体化治疗到精准医学[J].中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(7):697-700. 被引量:34
  • 3Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, et al. Strategies for sub-types--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 [J]. Ann Oncol,2011,22(8): 1736-1747. 被引量:1
  • 4高国璇,张虹,张爽,刘倩,徐玲,叶京明,段学宁,李挺,刘荫华.首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌66例临床病理分析[J].中华外科杂志,2015,53(12):935-940. 被引量:5
  • 5Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 [J]. Ann Oncol,2013,24(9): 2206-2223. 被引量:1
  • 6Ameriean Joint Committee on Cancer [S/OL]. [2016-09-15]. http://caneerstang.org/Abant[Psges/Sth-Edition.aspx. 被引量:1
  • 7Leon SA, Shapiro B, Sklaroff DM, et al. Free DNA in the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy [ J ]. Cancer Res,1977, 37(3):646-650. 被引量:1
  • 8Forshew T, Murtaza M, Parkinson C, et al. Noninvasive identifi- cation and monitoring of cancer mutations by targeted deep se- quencing of plasma DNA [J]. Sci Transl Med,2012,4(136): 136r-168r. 被引量:1
  • 9Shaw JA, Page K, Blighe K, et al. Genomic analysis of circulat- ing cell-free DNA infers breast cancer dormancy [J]. Genome Res ,2012,22(2): 220-231. 被引量:1
  • 10Leary ILl, Sansen M, Kinde I, et al. Detection of chromosomal alterations in the circulation of cancer patients with whole-ge- nome sequencing[J]. Sei Transl Med,2012,4(162):154r-162r. 被引量:1

二级参考文献27

  • 1Budd GT, Barlow WE, Moore HCF, et al. SWOG S0221: A phase III trial comparing chemotherapy schedules in high-risk ear- ly-stage breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(1): 58-64. 被引量:1
  • 2Samuel JA, Wilson JW, Bandos H. NSABP B-36: a randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) to four cycles of adria- mycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in patients (pts) with node-negative breast cancer [C]. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2014: S3-02. 被引量:1
  • 3Eiermann W, Pienkowski T, Crown J, et al. Phase III study of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with concomitant versus sequen- tial docetaxel as adjuvant treatment in patients with human epi- dermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, node-positive breast cancer: BCIRG-005 trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(29): 3877-3884. 被引量:1
  • 4Davies C. Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Longer Against Shorter (ATLAS) Collaborative Group. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a ran- domised trial [J]. Lancet, 2013, 381(9869): 804-804. 被引量:1
  • 5Jin H, Tu D, Zhao N, et al. Longer-term outcomes of letrozole versus placebo after 5 years of tamoxifen in the NCIC CTG MA. 17 trial: analyses: adjusting for treatment crossover [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(7): 718-721. 被引量:1
  • 6Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley B, et al: Randomized comparison of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane (E) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) vs tamoxifen (3") plus OFS in pre- menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC): Joint analysis of IBCSG TEXT and SOFT tri- als [C].ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2014, 32(18 suppl): LBA 1. 被引量:1
  • 7Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF. Randomized comparison of adjuvant tamoxifen (T) plus ovarian function suppression (0FS) versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with hormone recep- tor-positive (HR + ) early breast cancer (BC): analysis of the SOFT trial [C~. San Antnni9 Breast Cancer Symposium, 2014: $3-08. 被引量:1
  • 8Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M, et al. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11 (12): 1135-1141. 被引量:1
  • 9Regan MM, Neven P, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. BIG 1-98 Col- laborative Group; International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBC- SG). Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in se- quence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone recep- tor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical tri- al at 8.1 years median follow-up [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12 (12): 1101-1108. 被引量:1
  • 10Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. Final overall surviv- al: fulvestrant 500rag vs 250rag in the randomized CONFIRM trial[J]. J Nati Cancer Inst, 2014,106(1):djt 337. 被引量:1

共引文献37

同被引文献288

引证文献36

二级引证文献228

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部