摘要
目的研究腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与传统开腹子宫全切术(TAH)的临床效果。方法将我院55例LAVH与同期57例TAH作比较,分析临床指标差异。结果两组在术中出血量、手术时间的比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但LAVH在术后最高体温、术后排气时间、住院天数方面与TAH比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术,优于传统开腹子宫全切术。
Objective To study the clinical effect of laparo-scopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy（ LAVH） and traditional hysterectomy（ TAH） . Methods Compare the LAVH with the same period in 55 cases in our hospital 57 cases of TAH. Results Two groups of bleeding during operation, operation time, no significant difference（P〉0. 05）, but LAVH in postoperative highest temperature, postoperative exhaust time, hospitalization days compared with that of TAH, there was significant difference. Conclu-sion Laparo-scopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, is superior to the traditional laparotomy hysterectomy.
出处
《四川医学》
CAS
2015年第3期374-376,共3页
Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词
腹腔镜
阴式子宫切除术
经腹子宫切除术
laparoscopic
vaginal hysterectomy
transabdominal hysterectomy
