摘要
对于中国(乡村)经验中个案的代表性和自身社会研究的客观性问题,已有类型比较法和扩展(延伸)个案法等方法论对策,但如何从操作层面克服对个案经验的"麻痹症",提高对自身社会经验的敏感性,仍值探讨。区别于综合、专题、深描、多点民族志和区域比较等方法,类型比较视野下的深度个案以类型比较视野作为特殊的"他者"眼光,增强深度个案和本土社会研究的理论自觉。中国经验的厚重、广博与多样性决定了此种表述,以及中国研究本土化的必要性与可能性。
In order to enhance the representativeness of individual cases in Chinese rural experiences and the objectivity of our own social studies, some methodological tactics such as typological comparison and the theory of extended individual cases have been developed. However, questions remain as to how to overcome apathy for individual cases on the operative level and how to enhance sensitivity to our own social experiences. As opposed to such methods as comprehensive, thematic, deep-descriptive and multi-spot ethnology and regional comparison, the method of in-depth individual cases in the perspective of typological comparison take the vision of typological comparison as the special view of ＂the other＂, which helps to raise theoretical self-awareness in the studies of indepth individual cases and local society. The depth, breadth and variety of Chinese experiences dictate the necessity and possibility of such representation and the localization of Sinology.
出处
《开放时代》
CSSCI
2009年第8期101-113,共13页
Open Times
