摘要
目的:分析我国目前破坏性地震应急药学服务体系的研究现状和存在问题。方法:电子检索PubMed,Medline,Cochrane图书馆,Embase,CNKI,维普(VIP),万方七大数据库(从建库-2014.1)及政府相关网站,收集地震应急药学服务体系的的相关文献及涉及突发事件的政策法规。用Endnote软件管理文献,Excel绘制图表,对符合纳入标准的文献按主题分类总结,对政策法规进行描述性分析。结果:符合纳入标准的文献共93篇,2008年后,中文文献数量反超英文文献,并维持高位。目前颁布的政策法规均未涉及应急药学服务体系。结论:由于缺乏关于相关高质量证据,导致已颁发的政策法规均无对破坏性地震应急药学服务体系的指导和建议。亟待建立破坏性地震应急药学服务体系的标准、流程及方法,指导提高此后此类研究的质量。
OBJECTIVE To analyze research status and problems of emergency pharmacy service against destructive earthquakes.METHODS Databases such as PubMed,Medline,the Cochrane Library,Embase,CNKI,VIP,WANFANG and Government websites were searched.Literatures were collected for emergency pharmacy service against destructive earthquakes,policies and regulations related to emergency.Endnote was used to manage literatures and Microsoft excel to draw chart.Literature satisfying inclusion criteria were classified according to subjects and descriptive analysis on policies and regulations.RESULTSA total of 93 studies were included.Since 2008,number of Chinese literatures was more than that of English literatures.Policies and regulations never referred to emergency pharmacy service against destructive earthquakes.CONCLUSION Due to absence of high quality relevant evidences,policies and regulations issued do not give guidance and advice for emergency pharmacy service against destructive earthquakes.It is necessary to establish standards,processes and methods for emergency pharmacy service against destructive earthquakes.
出处
《中国医院药学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第10期848-855,共8页
Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
基金
四川省科技厅
突发事件应急药品保障体系建设与循证评价(编号:2014ZR0080)
关键词
地震
循证评价
应急药学
earthquake
evidence-based evaluation
emergency medicine
