摘要
2013年修订的《消费者权益保护法》增加了关于消费者公益诉讼制度的规定。立法者对该制度做了一系列规范性的限制。该规定在防止滥诉的同时,也在一定程度上限制了消费者公益诉讼功能的发挥,妨碍了消费者利益的有效救济。在此背景下,不妨考虑对消费者公益诉讼进行非规范性的限制,即通过完善传统的私益诉讼等其他救济路径,间接限制公益诉讼的适用。该做法既不影响公益诉讼的适用,又有利于其他维权方式的进一步完善,从而推动消费者维权制度的发展。
The Law on the Protection of Consumer’s Rights and Interests revised in 2013 added provisions on consumer public law suit. Legislators have made a series of normative restrictions on the system.While such provisions can prevent excessive litigation,it not only limits the functional exertion of consumer public lawsuit,but also impedes the effective remedy of consumer rights. Thus the non-normative restrictions are introduced,which means restricting indirectly the application of public interest litigation through developing traditional private interest litigation and other remedies.By thisway,it would make side effect on the application of consumer public lawsuit;On the other hand,it helps to further improve othermeans of rights’ protection,and finally promotes the whole systemof consumer rights’ protection.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2014年第3期123-126,共4页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
消费者权益
公益诉讼
规范性限制
consumer rights
public interest litigation
normative restriction
