期刊文献+

我国上市公司股权分置改革中的锚定效应研究 被引量:83

A Study on Anchoring Effect for Non-tradable Share Reform of Listed Companies in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 股权分置改革是我国资本市场发展中一个独特的经济问题。本文收集526家实施股改公司的相关资料,运用行为心理学著名的“锚定效应”理论,对股权分置改革中对价的制定和对价的影响因素两大问题进行分析、检验和解释。 The non-tradable share reform is an issue unique to capital market in China. This paper uses the theory of "anchoring effect" in psychology, to investigate two key issues : how to set up compensation ratio and determinants of compensation ratio. The results from a sample of 526 reformed firms show that: (1) compensation ratio is set up irrationally by the reformed firms, there exists significant "anchoring and adjustment" biases; (2) when setting up compensation ratio, reformed firms mainly use two anchor, the static anchor-the average compensation ratio of first 3 pilot firms, and the moving anchor-the average ratio of preceding round of reformed firms; (3) as the reform progress, not matter based on the static anchor or the moving anchor, for the second round pilot firms, the compensation ratios are more affected by.the "anchor", but less affected by other variables, anchoring effect is strong; but for the full-scale reformed firms, the compensation ratios are more affected by other variables, but less affected by the "anchor", anchoring effect is weak; (4) not matter based on the static low/high anchor or the moving low/high anchor, for firms which offer low compensation ratio, the compensation ratios are more affected by the "low anchor", but less affected by other variables, anchoring effect is strong; but for firms which offer high compensation ratio, the compensation ratios are more affected by the "high anchor", but less affected by other variables, anchoring effect is weak.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期114-125,共12页 Economic Research Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70632001)的资助
关键词 锚定效应 股权分置改革 对价 Anchoring Effect Non-tradable Share Reform Compensation Ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Chapman, G. B., and Johnson, E. J., 1994, "The Limits of Anchoring", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, PP223-242. 被引量:1
  • 2Chapman, G. B., and Johnson, E. J., "Incorporating the Irrelevant : Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value", In Gilovich, T., Griffin,D. , and Kahneman, D., Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, 2002, PP120-138. 被引量:1
  • 3Chen, Zhiwu, and Peng Xiong, 2001, "Discounts on Illiquid Stocks: Evidence from China", Working Paper, No.00-56, Yale International Center for Finance. 被引量:1
  • 4George, T.J. and Chuan-yang Hwang, 2004, "The 52-week High and Momentum Investing", Journal of Finance, 59, PP2145-2175. 被引量:1
  • 5Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., and Krull, D. S., 1988, "On Cognitive Busyness: When Person Perceivers Meet Person Reeeivers",Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, PP733-740. 被引量:1
  • 6Quattrone, G. A., Lawrence, C. P., Finkel, S. E., and Andrus, D. C., 1981, "Explorations in Anchoring: The Effects of Prior Range,Anchor Extremity, and Suggestive Hints", Unpublished Manuscript, Stanford University. 被引量:1
  • 7Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1974, "Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases", Science, 185, PP1124-1130. 被引量:1
  • 8Wilson, T. D., Houston, C., Etling, K. M., and Brekke, N., 1996, "A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and It Antecedents", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 4, PP387-402. 被引量:1

引证文献83

二级引证文献1149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部