期刊文献+

发电上市公司经营效绩与高管薪酬的相关性分析模型 被引量:9

An Empirical Analysis Model of the Relationship Between Power Generation Listed Corporations' Performance and Super Managers' Compensation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国发电行业正处于从垄断向竞争、计划向市场转变的阶段,发电企业高管人员的报酬激励日益受到重视。本文以在国内证券市场上市的38家发电企业作为样本,实证性研究其2001—2003年高管薪酬与公司经营效绩之间的相关性。首先作全部样本和剔除异常点后样本的所有年度和分年度的相关分析和偏相关分析,再把定量指标做定性化处理,采用列联表独立必检验来分析绩效与薪酬之间的关系,结果表明二者之间不具有相关性。文章最后根据发电企业实际情况对结果进行了解释,并对发电企业高管薪酬制度的设计提出了有关建议。 <Abstrcat> The industry of power generation is on stage of change from monopoly to competition,from planned economy to market economy.The reward motivation to senior managers of power generation corporations is more and more concerned.It this paper,38 corporations,which have come to the domestic security market,are selected as stylebook. Demonstrated studies have been made on relationship between manager reward and management performance from 2001 to 2003.First,all-years and annual analyses of correlation and partial correlation have been made to all samples and abnormal-excluded samples,then contingency table is used to analyze relationship between performance and reward.The result shows no correlation between the two.The final part of the paper explains the result according to practical situation of the corporations,and proposals are given to the design of the senior managers' reward system.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2005年第3期119-125,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70373017) 华北电力大学重大项目预研基金 国家电网公司科技项目的资助
关键词 发电公司 薪酬 经营效绩 相关性分析 power generation corporation reward firm performance correlation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1罗跃龙,况漠.基于企业类型差异的企业家报酬—业绩的相关性[J].当代经济科学,2003,25(4):50-55. 被引量:23
  • 2费方域.控制内部人控制:国企改革中的治理机制研究[J].经济研究,1996,31(6):31-39. 被引量:129
  • 3青木昌彦.转轨经济中的公司治理结构[M].中国经济出版社,1995.. 被引量:72
  • 4[3]Albowed, B. C. and Pudinson, F., 1993. Executive compensation and firm techno- density, Strategic Management Journal 10,65 - 74. 被引量:1
  • 5[4]Baysinger,B. D. and Ktsniksson, R. E., 1994. The composition of the board of directors and trategic control: Effects of corporate strategy, Academy of Management Review 15, 72-87. 被引量:1
  • 6[5]Conyon, M. J. and Lee, D. , 1994. Top pay, company perfor-mance and corporate governance, Oxford Bulletion of Economics and Statistics 05,104- 114. 被引量:1
  • 7[6]Coughian,A. T. and Schmidr, R. C., 1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and finn performance ,Journal of Accounting and economics 07,43 -66. 被引量:1
  • 8[7]Eriksson ,M. C. and Buffier,D. R,2000. A study of the correlation of guerdon- performance and firm scale, Journal of Accounting and economics 10,42- 53. 被引量:1
  • 9[8]Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D. D., 1989. Chief executive compensation: a study of the intersection of markets and political processes, Strategic Management Journal 10,121 - 134. 被引量:1
  • 10[9]Hall, W. R., 1998. Enterpriser behavior and performance incentives, Journal of Accounting and economics 25,42-45. 被引量:1

共引文献1409

同被引文献129

引证文献9

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部