摘要
目的探讨3M自凝釉质粘接剂与京津釉质粘接剂的临床操作及粘接效果的异同。方法挑选12～14岁正畸患者40例,男19例,女21例,按就诊先后顺序随机分成两组:3M组和京津组,在同一护士配合下由同一位医师完成所有患者上半口托槽的粘接,分别记录各患者的粘接时间及1个月后的托槽脱落情况并进行统计学分析。结果3M组临床操作时间为(10.42±1.24)min,明显短于京津组的(12.05±0.89)min,统计学分析有显著性差异;但两组的托槽脱落率分别为3.8%和3.4%,差异无统计学意义。结论在充分注意牙面清洁和隔湿、获得患者和家长配合的前提下,3M自凝釉质粘接剂与京津釉质粘接剂的短期粘接效果无明显差异。良好的护理配合是获得良好粘接效果的关键因素之一。
Objective To explore the clinical operation of 3 M enamel bonding age nt and Jingjin enamel bonding agent and compare their adhesive effect. Methods 19 boys and 21 girls aged 12~14 were selected to divide them into two groups acc ording to their registered time: 3 M group and Jingjin group. With the help from the same nurse, the doctor completed the adhesion of bracket, recorded the adhe sion time and even the shedding after one month for statistical analysis. Result s The average operation time in 3 M group was (10.42±1.24)min, significantly s horter than that in Jingjin Group (12.05±0.89)min. The shedding rates in the groups were 3.8% and 3.4%, without statistical significance. Conclusion Unde r the conditions of fully cleaning tooth face and separating from moisture and p atient's and their family's cooperation, 3 M and Jingjin orthodontic enamel bond ing agents are not different in view of their short-term adhesive effect.
出处
《南方护理学报》
2005年第4期20-21,共2页
Nanfang Journal of Nursing
关键词
釉质粘接剂
托槽
脱落率
enamel bonding agent
bracket
shedding rate
