摘要
文章认为从国际法方面看钓鱼岛的主权属于中国 ,日本所主张的“无主地先占”原则根本不能成立。根据联合国新海洋法和国际司法判例 ,钓鱼岛不应享有大陆架和专属经济区 ,亦不具有划界效力。中日东海大陆架的划分应遵循公平和自然延伸的原则。在和平解决争端的前景下 。
This article holds that viewing at the angle of international law the sovereignty of the Diaoyudao Island belongs to China, the principle of “preoccupation of the land without owner' claimed by Japan does not hold water at all. According to the United Nations' new Law of the Sea and the relevant international judical cases, the Diaoyudao island does not enjoy the continental shelf, does not have its specially owned economic zone, does not possess the demarcation effect. The Sino-Japanese demarcation of the East China Sea's continental shelf should follow the principles of justice and natural stretch. For a peaceful solution of the issue, there will be three possibilities for choice in the future.
出处
《中国边疆史地研究》
CSSCI
2001年第1期75-83,共9页
China's Borderland History and Geography Studies
关键词
国际法
钓鱼岛问题
国际司法
大陆架
判例
争端
主权
和平解决
专属经济区
成立
the Sino-Japanese issue over the Diaoyudao Island the international law principle of justice principle of the intertemporal Law peacefull solution
