摘要
价值判断问题是民法问题的核心。在价值取向多元的背景下 ,民法学者如何能够经由理性的讨论 ,就具体的价值判断问题寻求相互理解 ,进而达成价值共识 ,是本文讨论的重点。论文在简要评析法律论证理论得失的基础上 ,以中国民法学者最低限度的价值共识为前提 ,提出两项民法学者讨论价值判断问题的实体性论证规则 :即在没有足够充分且正当理由的情况下 ,应当坚持强式意义上的平等对待 ;在没有足够充分且正当理由的情况下 ,不得主张限制民事主体的自由。论文认为 ,民法学者讨论价值判断问题 ,惟有以实体性的论证规则为前提 ,遵循作为程序性技术的论证规则和形式 ,运用妥当的论证方法 ,方可达致相互理解 ,也才有可能在相互理解的基础上就具体的价值判断问题形成价值共识。
Value judgment is at the core of civil law. This paper explores how students of civil law reach mutual understanding and consensus on specific value judgment by rational discussion in the context of multiple values. Based on a brief evaluat ion of the theory of legal reasoning and with the minimal value consensus of Chi nese civil law students as the premise, I propose two substantive rules of reaso ning for civil students to discuss value judgment: first, strong version of equa l treatment must be carried out in absence of sufficient and justified reasons f or otherwise; and second, the freedom of civil subject must not be restrained in absence of sufficient and justified reasons for otherwise. To reach mutual unde rstanding and, based on that, new consensus on specific value judgment, students of civil law must base their discussions on value judgment on substantive rule of reasoning, follow rules and forms of reasoning as procedural techniques, and apply proper methods of reasoning.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第6期104-116,共13页
Social Sciences in China
